It was a Saturday morning, and Sarah was on a mission. With only $50 to spare, she needed a dress for a friend’s wedding, and she had her sights set on Ross Dress for Less. As she entered the store, she felt a familiar sense of thrill—racks upon racks of discounted clothes, shoes, and accessories waiting to be uncovered like hidden treasures. After a half-hour of sifting through a mix of casual wear, formal dresses, and name-brand items, she found a dress that seemed too good to be true: an elegant piece for just $19.99. “How do they even sell it for that price?” she wondered. This is a question many consumers ask themselves when they walk into retailers like Ross, where prices are a fraction of what you’d expect at traditional department stores. But does Ross fall into the category of fast fashion? Or does its business model operate differently from other low-cost, high-volume retailers?
Defining Fast Fashion
Before we examine Ross specifically, it’s important to define what fast fashion entails. Fast fashion refers to a business model characterized by quickly producing cheap, trendy clothing that mimics the latest runway designs. Companies like Zara, H&M, and Forever 21 are prime examples of fast fashion. They produce new collections at breakneck speed, encouraging consumers to purchase more clothing, more frequently. This rapid turnaround is fueled by a focus on volume, low production costs, and a disposable approach to fashion. According to a 2020 report by the Ellen MacArthur Foundation, the average consumer buys 60% more clothing today than they did 15 years ago, yet each item is kept for half as long, contributing significantly to environmental damage and textile waste.
Fast fashion retailers are typically characterized by a few key attributes:
- Short production cycles – Clothes are designed and manufactured within weeks, not months.
- Low prices – Clothing is extremely affordable, encouraging frequent purchasing.
- High inventory turnover – New items appear in stores frequently, pushing out older stock.
- Disposable design – The quality of items is often low, encouraging short-term use before disposal.
Ross’ Business Model: Discount Retail vs. Fast Fashion
Ross Dress for Less is categorized as an “off-price” retailer, which operates on a different model than traditional fast fashion chains. Ross does not manufacture its clothing or create collections based on the latest fashion trends. Instead, it buys overstock, cancelled orders, and unsold inventory from other retailers and manufacturers, often at a significant discount. This allows Ross to offer brand-name and designer items at prices that are lower than what you’d typically find in department stores.
According to Ross’ 2022 annual report, the company operates on a “no-frills” approach to retailing, offering merchandise at 20%-60% below regular department and speciality store prices. The retailer has limited in-store services, and sparse decor, and doesn’t invest heavily in marketing or fancy storefronts. The savings from these cost-cutting measures are passed directly to the customer.
While fast fashion retailers aim to churn out trend-driven designs at rapid speeds, Ross focuses on selling existing inventory that it acquires through opportunistic buying. This means that Ross is less concerned with following trends and more focused on offering a wide variety of goods at deeply discounted prices. For instance, you might find last season’s designer handbags alongside name-brand athletic wear, but the offerings are unpredictable and constantly changing.
Key Differences Between Ross and Fast Fashion Retailers
- Inventory Sources: Fast fashion companies design and produce their clothing, often mimicking high-fashion trends seen on runways. Ross, by contrast, does not manufacture its goods. It purchases overstock or unsold merchandise from other retailers, often at a discount.
- Production Speed: Fast fashion companies are built on rapidly turning over new designs to reflect current trends. They design, produce, and ship products in a matter of weeks. Ross is more reactive, acquiring goods after they’ve already been produced, and it doesn’t adhere to a fast turnaround on trends.
- Sustainability and Waste: Fast fashion has been heavily criticized for its contribution to environmental damage. In 2018, the United Nations reported that the fashion industry is responsible for 10% of global carbon emissions and nearly 20% of wastewater. Because Ross primarily deals with overstock and unsold inventory, some argue that it helps reduce waste by giving unsold items a second chance to be purchased and used. However, the environmental footprint of discounted clothing is still significant, as low prices can encourage consumers to buy more than they need.
- Price and Value Perception: While both Ross and fast fashion retailers offer low prices, the perception of value is different. Ross’ customers are typically shopping for deals on brand-name items, while fast fashion customers may be looking for inexpensive, trendy items regardless of brand.
How Ross and Off-Price Retailers Affect the Fashion Industry
Ross and other off-price retailers like T.J. Maxx and Burlington Coat Factory offer an alternative to the fast fashion model by focusing on surplus inventory. This model can be more sustainable in certain respects, as it prevents unsold goods from going to waste. However, it still feeds into a culture of overconsumption. Cheap prices, whether in fast fashion or off-price retail, make it easier for consumers to buy more than they need, contributing to the “buy-use-dispose” cycle that is harmful to the environment.
According to a 2021 report from ThredUp, a leading online consignment store, 36 billion clothing items are thrown away each year in the United States alone, 95% of which could be reused or recycled. Off-price retailers may reduce the initial waste by buying up unsold inventory, but they also fuel the cycle of consumption by offering items at prices that encourage impulse buying.
Ethical Considerations
The rise of discount retailers like Ross raises questions not only about sustainability but also about labour practices. While Ross doesn’t directly manufacture its clothing, it still sources items from suppliers, and those suppliers may use factories in developing countries where labour laws are lax, and working conditions are poor. According to a 2016 study by the International Labour Organization, 74 million people worldwide are employed in the textile, clothing, and footwear industries, many of them in conditions that fall short of ethical standards. Although Ross itself doesn’t manage these production facilities, its reliance on discounted goods may indirectly support exploitative labour practices in regions where labour is cheap.
Ross faced legal challenges in the past concerning labour issues. For instance, in 2014, the U.S. Department of Labor cited Ross for selling clothes that were produced in sweatshops in Los Angeles, where workers were paid less than the federal minimum wage. Though Ross does not have control over production in the way fast fashion brands do, its business model may still contribute to the problem of unethical labour.
Conclusion
While Ross Dress for Less does not fit the traditional definition of a fast fashion retailer, it operates within a broader fashion ecosystem that shares some of the same challenges, including overconsumption, sustainability issues, and potential labour concerns. Ross may not produce its fast-fashion-like clothing, but its low prices and reliance on surplus inventory contribute to a similar cycle of consumerism that fast fashion is often criticized for.
Ross offers an alternative to fast fashion by providing discounted, brand-name items rather than producing cheap, trend-driven garments. However, the ethical and environmental challenges of the retail industry are not exclusive to fast fashion. Both off-price retailers like Ross and fast fashion brands have roles to play in shaping a more sustainable and ethical fashion future.
You may also read
